Robotic versus open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (EUROPA): a randomised controlled stage 2b trial.

Background: Open partial pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) represents the current gold standard of surgical treatment of a wide range of diseases of the pancreatic head but is associated with morbidity in around 40% of cases. Robotic partial pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) is being used increasingly, yet, no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of RPD versus OPD have been published, leaving a low level of evidence to support this practice. Methods: This investigator-initiated, exploratory RCT with two parallel study arms was conducted at a high-volume pancreatic centre in line with IDEAL recommendations (stage 2b). Patients scheduled for elective partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for any indication were randomised (1:1) to RPD or OPD with a centralised web-based tool. The primary endpoint was postoperative cumulative morbidity within 90 days, assessed via the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Biometricians were blinded to the intervention, but patients and surgeons were not. The trial was registered prospectively (DRKS00020407). Findings: Between June 3, 2020 and February 14, 2022, 81 patients were randomly assigned to RPD (n = 41) or OPD (n = 40), of whom 62 patients (RPD: n = 29, OPD: n = 33) were analysed in the modified intention to treat analysis. Four patients in the OPD group were randomised, but did not undergo surgery in our department and one patient was excluded in the RPD group due to other reason. Nine patients in the RPD group and 3 patients in the OPD were excluded from the primary analysis because they did not undergo PD, but rather underwent other types of surgery. The CCI after 90 days was comparable between groups (RPD: 34.02 ± 23.48 versus OPD: 36.45 ± 27.65, difference in means [95% CI]: -2.42 [-15.55; 10.71], p = 0.713). The RPD group had a higher incidence of grade B/C pancreas-specific complications compared to the OPD group (17 (58.6%) versus 11 (33.3%); difference in rates [95% CI]: 25.3% [1.2%; 49.4%], p = 0.046). The only complication that occurred significantly more often in the RPD than in the OPD group was clinically relevant delayed gastric emptying. Procedure-related and overall hospital costs were significantly higher and duration of surgery was longer in the RPD group. Blood loss did not differ significantly between groups. The intraoperative conversion rate of RPD was 23%. Overall 90-day mortality was 4.8% without significant differences between RPD and OPD. Interpretation: In the setting of a very high-volume centre, both RPD and OPD can be considered safe techniques. Further confirmatory multicentre RCTs are warranted to uncover potential advantages of RPD in terms of perioperative and long-term outcomes. Funding: Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF: 01KG2010).

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Is Not Associated With Improved Survival After Pancreatic Surgery: Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized Controlled PAKMAN Trial.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (EDA) and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) are common forms of analgesia after pancreatic surgery. Current guidelines recommend EDA over PCIA, and evidence suggests that EDA may improve long-term survival after surgery, especially in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether perioperative EDA is associated with an improved patient prognosis compared to PCIA in pancreatic surgery. METHODS: The PAKMAN trial was an adaptive, pragmatic, international, multicenter, randomized controlled superiority trial conducted from June 2015 to October 2017. Three to five years after index surgery a long-term follow-up was performed from October 2020 to April 2021. RESULTS: For long-term follow-up of survival, 109 patients with EDA were compared to 111 patients with PCIA after partial pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Long-term follow-up of quality of life (QoL) and pain assessment was available for 40 patients with EDA and 45 patients with PCIA (questionnaire response rate: 94%). Survival analysis revealed that EDA, when compared to PCIA, was not associated with improved overall survival (OS, HR, 1.176, 95% HR-CI, 0.809-1.710, P = .397, n = 220). Likewise, recurrence-free survival did not differ between groups (HR, 1.116, 95% HR-CI, 0.817-1.664, P = .397, n = 220). OS subgroup analysis including only patients with malignancies showed no significant difference between EDA and PCIA (HR, 1.369, 95% HR-CI, 0.932-2.011, P = .109, n = 179). Similar long-term effects on QoL and pain severity were observed in both groups (EDA: n = 40, PCIA: n = 45). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this long-term follow-up of the PAKMAN randomized controlled trial do not support favoring EDA over PCIA in pancreatic surgery. Until further evidence is available, EDA and PCIA should be considered similar regarding long-term survival.

Primary Tumor Resection Before Systemic Therapy in Patients With Colon Cancer and Unresectable Metastases: Combined Results of the SYNCHRONOUS and CCRe-IV Trials.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy is established as primary treatment in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases. Data from nonrandomized clinical trials have fueled persistent uncertainty if primary tumor resection (PTR) before chemotherapy prolongs survival. We investigated the prognostic value of PTR in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV colon cancer who were not amenable to curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled in the multicenter, randomized SYNCHRONOUS and CCRe-IV trials were included in the analysis. Patients with colon cancer with synchronous unresectable metastases were randomly assigned at 100 sites in Austria, Germany, and Spain to undergo PTR or up-front chemotherapy (No PTR group). The chemotherapy regimen was left at discretion of the local team. Patients with tumor-related symptoms, inability to tolerate surgery and/or systemic chemotherapy, and history of another cancer were excluded. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the analyses were performed with intention-to-treat. RESULTS: A total of 393 patients were randomly assigned to undergo PTR (n = 187) or no PTR (n = 206) between November 2011 and March 2017. Chemotherapy was not administered to 6.4% in the No PTR group and 24.1% in the PTR group. The median follow-up time was 36.7 months (95% CI, 36.6 to 37.3). The median OS was 16.7 months (95% CI, 13.2 to 19.2) in the PTR group and 18.6 months (95% CI, 16.2 to 22.3) in the No PTR group (P = .191). Comparable OS between the study groups was further confirmed on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.944 [95% CI, 0.738 to 1.209], P = .65) and across all subgroups. Patients with serious adverse events were more common in the No PTR group (10.2% v 18.0%; P = .027). CONCLUSION: Among patients with colon cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases, PTR before systemic chemotherapy was not associated with prolonged OS.

Portal vein resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Surgery offers the only cure for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Data on incidence, perioperative and long-term outcomes of portal vein resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are scarce. This study aimed to analyze the outcome and prognostic factors of portal vein resection in surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. METHODS: Consecutive patients were analyzed. Portal vein resection was classified according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Clinicopathologic features and overall and disease-free survival were assessed and compared with standard resection in a matched-pair analysis. RESULTS: A total of 54 of 666 (8%) resected pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms patients underwent portal vein resection, including 7 (13%) tangential resections with venorrhaphy (type 1), 2 (4%) patch reconstructions (type 2), 35 (65%) end-to-end anastomoses (type 3), and 10 (19%) graft interpositions (type 4); 52% of those underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, 22% distal pancreatectomy, and 26% total pancreatectomy. Postoperative portal vein thrombosis occurred in 19%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula grades B and C (9% vs 16%; P = .357), complications Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb (28% vs 13%; P = .071), and 90-day mortality rate (2% each) were not significantly different compared with 108 matched patients. The 5-year overall survival was 45% (standard resection: 68%; P = .432), and the 5-year disease-free survival was 25% (standard resection: 34%; P = .716). Radical resection was associated with 5-year overall survival of 51% and 5-year disease-specific survival of 75%. CONCLUSION: This is the largest single-center analysis evaluating perioperative and long-term outcomes of portal vein resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. The postoperative complication rate after portal vein resection is comparable with standard resection. The 90-day mortality is low. Radical resection leads to excellent 5-year oncological survival.

Tranexamic Acid Administration During Liver Transplantation Is Not Associated With Lower Blood Loss or With Reduced Utilization of Red Blood Cell Transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Current clinical guidelines recommend antifibrinolytic treatment for liver transplantation to reduce blood loss and transfusion utilization. However, the clinical relevance of fibrinolysis during liver transplantation is questionable, a benefit of tranexamic acid (TXA) in this context is not supported by sufficient evidence, and adverse effects are also conceivable. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that use of TXA is associated with reduced blood loss. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2004 and 2017 at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to determine the association between TXA administration and the primary end point intraoperative blood loss and the secondary end point intra- and postoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. For further secondary outcome analyses, the time to the first occurrence of a composite end point of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and thrombosis of the inferior vena cava were analyzed using a univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Data from 779 transplantations were included in the final analysis. The median intraoperative blood loss was 3000 mL (1600-5500 mL). Intraoperative TXA administration occurred in 262 patients (33.6%) with an average dose of 1.4 ± 0.7 g and was not associated with intraoperative blood loss (regression coefficient B, -0.020 [-0.051 to 0.012], P = .226) or any of the secondary end points (intraoperative RBC transfusion; regression coefficient B, 0.023 [-0.006 to 0.053], P = .116), postoperative RBC transfusion (regression coefficient B, 0.007 [-0.032 to 0.046], P = .717), and occurrence of thrombosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.110 [0.903-1.365], P = .321). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the use of TXA during liver transplantation. Physicians should exercise caution and consider individual factors when deciding whether or not to administer TXA.

The PAncreatic Surgery Composite Endpoint PACE - Development and Validation of a Clinically Relevant Endpoint Requiring Lower Sample Sizes.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a composite endpoint in pancreatic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Single endpoints in prospective and randomized studies have become impractical due to their low frequency and the marginal benefit of new interventions. METHODS: Data from prospective studies were used to develop (n=1273) and validate (n=544) a composite endpoint based on postoperative pancreatic fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage as well as reoperation and reinterventions. All patients had pancreatectomies of different extents. The association of the developed PAncreatic surgery Composite Endpoint (PACE) with prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) >75th percentile and mortality was assessed. A single-institution database was used for external validation (n = 2666). Sample size calculations were made for single outcomes and the composite endpoint. RESULTS: In the internal validation cohort, the PACE demonstrated an AUC of 78.0%, a sensitivity of 90.4% and a specificity of 67.6% in predicting a prolonged LOS. In the external cohort, the AUC was 76.9%, the sensitivity 73.8% and the specificity 80.1%. The 90-day mortality rate was significantly different for patients with a positive versus a negative PACE both in the development and internal validation cohort (5.1% vs 0.9%; P< 0.001), as well as in the external validation cohort (8.5% vs 1.2%, P< 0.001). The PACE enabled sample size reductions of up to 80.5% compared to single outcomes. CONCLUSION: The PACE performed well in predicting prolonged hospital stays and can be used as a standardized and clinically relevant endpoint for future prospective trials enabling lower sample sizes and therefore improved feasibility compared to single outcome parameters.

Distal Pancreatectomy: Extent of Resection Determines Surgical Risk Categories.

BACKGROUND: Recently, subclassification of pancreatoduodenectomy in 4 differing types has been reported, because additional major vascular and multivisceral resections have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To classify distal pancreatectomy (DP) based on the extent of resection and technical difficulty and to evaluate postoperative outcomes with regards to this classification system. METHODS: All consecutive patients who had undergone DP between 2001 and 2020 in a high-volume pancreatic surgery center were included in this study. DPs were subclassified into 4 distinct categories reflecting the extent of resection and technical difficulty, including standard DP (type 1), DP with venous (type 2), multivisceral (type 3), or arterial resection (type 4). Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed and compared among the 4 groups. RESULTS: A total of 2135 patients underwent DP. Standard DP was the most frequently performed procedure (64.8%). The overall 90-day mortality rate was 1.6%. Morbidity rates were higher in patients with additional vascular or multivisceral resections, and 90-day mortality gradually increased with the extent of resection from standard DP to DP with arterial resection (type 1: 0.7%; type 2: 1.3%; type 3: 3%; type 4: 8.7%; P <0.0001). Multivariable analysis confirmed the type of DP as an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative outcomes after DP depend on the extent of resection and correlate with the type of DP. The implementation of the 4-type classification system allows standardized reporting of surgical outcomes after DP improving comparability of future studies.

Patient reported outcomes of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection in chronic pancreatitis: high effectivity is impaired by prolonged non-surgical management.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) causes suffering and socioeconomic burden. This study evaluated perioperative results and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in CP patients treated with duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). METHODS: Data were analyzed of CP patients undergoing DPPHR between 01/2001-10/2014. PROs were measured using a specifically designed questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-C30/PAN26. Associations between treatment variables and PROs were examined. RESULTS: Of 332 patients who received DPPHR, most (n = 251, 75.6%) underwent the Berne modification. Surgical morbidity was 21.5% (n = 71) and 90-day mortality 1.5% (n = 5). Median follow-up was 79.9 months, 5-year survival 90.5%, and 1.8% of patients developed pancreatic cancer. Of 283 patients alive, 178 (62.9%) returned questionnaires. Referral for surgery was self-initiated (38.0% of cases), by gastroenterologists (27.5%) and by general practitioners (21.1%). QoL improved in 78.7% of patients, remained stable in 12.1%, and worsened in 9.1%. Median Izbicki scores decreased from 90 to 5 points after surgery (p < 0.0001). Time from diagnosis to DPPHR was an independent, proportional predictor of a higher postoperative Izbicki score (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: DPPHR is an effective, safe treatment for CP. A delay in surgery decreases surgical effectivity, hence CP patients should be referred to surgery early to ensure satisfactory outcomes.

Risk Factors for Rectal Stump Leakage After Discontinuity Resection: Stump Length Matters Most.

BACKGROUND: Discontinuity resection is commonly conducted to avoid anastomotic leakage in high-risk patients but potentially results in rectal stump leakage. Although risk factors for anastomotic leakage have been widely studied, data on rectal stump leakage rates and underlying risk factors are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine rectal stump leakage rates following Hartmann's procedure and to identify patient-and surgery-associated risk factors. DESIGN: A retrospective study with univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to identify risk factors of rectal stump leakage. A subgroup analysis of scheduled operations was performed. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany. PATIENTS: Patients were included who underwent discontinuity resection with rectal stump formation between 2010 and 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures included rectal stump leakage rates, 30-day mortality, length of hospitalization, and necessity for further invasive treatment. RESULTS: Rectal stump leakage occurred in 11.78% of patients. Rectal stump leakage rates varied considerably depending on the surgical procedure performed and were highest following subtotal pelvic exenteration (34%). Diagnosis of rectal stump leakage peaked on postoperative day 7. A short rectal stump ( p = 0.001), previous pelvic radiotherapy ( p = 0.04), chemotherapy ( p = 0.004), and previous laparotomy ( p = 0.03) were independent risk factors for rectal stump leakage in the entire patient collective. In patients undergoing scheduled surgery, a short rectal stump was the only independent risk factor ( p = 0.003). Rectal stump leakage was not associated with increased 30-day mortality but prolonged length of hospitalization and frequently necessitated further invasive treatment. LIMITATIONS: Study results are limited by the retrospective design, a high number of emergency operations, and the mere inclusion of symptomatic leakages. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal stump leakage is a relevant complication after discontinuity resection. Risk factors should be considered during surgical decision-making when both discontinuity resection and abdominoperineal resection are feasible. See Video Abstract. FACTORES DE RIESGO PARA LA FUGA DEL MUN RECTAL DESPUS DE UNA RESECCIN POR DISCONTINUIDAD LA LONGITUD DEL MUN ES LO MS IMPORTANTE: ANTECEDENTES:La resección de discontinuidad se realiza comúnmente para evitar la fuga anastomótica en pacientes de alto riesgo, pero potencialmente da como resultado una fuga del muñón rectal. Si bien los factores de riesgo de fuga anastomótica se han estudiado ampliamente, los datos sobre las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal y los factores de riesgo subyacentes son escasos.OBJETIVO:Determinar las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal después del procedimiento de Hartmann e identificar los factores de riesgo asociados con el paciente y la cirugía.DISEÑO:Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo con análisis univariado y multivariado para identificar los factores de riesgo de fuga del muñón rectal. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de subgrupos de las operaciones programadas.AJUSTES:El estudio se realizó en el Hospital Universitario de Heidelberg, Alemania.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes que se sometieron a resección de discontinuidad con formación de muñón rectal entre 2010 y 2020.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Las principales medidas de resultado incluyeron las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal, la mortalidad a los 30 días, la duración de la hospitalización y la necesidad de un tratamiento invasivo adicional.RESULTADOS:La fuga del muñón rectal ocurrió en el 11,78% de los pacientes. Las tasas de fuga del muñón rectal variaron considerablemente según el procedimiento quirúrgico realizado y fueron más altas después de la exenteración pélvica subtotal (34%). El diagnóstico de fuga del muñón rectal alcanzó su punto máximo en el día 7 del postoperatorio. Un muñón rectal corto (p = 0,001), radioterapia pélvica previa (p = 0,04), quimioterapia (p = 0,004) y laparotomía previa (p = 0,03) fueron factores de riesgo independientes de fuga rectal. Fuga del muñón en todo el colectivo de pacientes. En los pacientes sometidos a cirugía programada, el muñón rectal corto fue el único factor de riesgo independiente (p = 0,003). La fuga del muñón rectal no se asoció con un aumento de la mortalidad a los 30 días, pero con una duración prolongada de la hospitalización y con frecuencia requirió un tratamiento invasivo adicional.LIMITACIONES:Los resultados del estudio están limitados por el diseño retrospectivo, un alto número de operaciones de emergencia y la mera inclusión de fugas sintomáticas.CONCLUSIONES:La fuga del muñón rectal es una complicación relevante tras la resección por discontinuidad. Se deben considerar los factores de riesgo durante la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas cuando son factibles tanto la resección por discontinuidad como la resección abdominoperineal. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Promising Outcomes of Modified ALPPS for Staged Hepatectomy in Cholangiocarcinoma.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a two-stage procedure that can potentially cure patients with large cholangiocarcinoma. The current study evaluates the impact of modifications on the outcomes of ALPPS in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In this single-center study, a series of 30 consecutive patients with cholangiocarcinoma (22 extrahepatic and 8 intrahepatic) who underwent ALPPS between 2011 and 2021 was evaluated. The ALPPS procedure in our center was modified in 2016 by minimizing the first stage of the surgical procedure through biliary externalization after the first stage, antibiotic administration during the interstage phase, and performing biliary reconstructions during the second stage. The rate of postoperative major morbidity and 90-day mortality, as well as the one- and three-year disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated and compared between patients operated before and after 2016. The ALPPS risk score before the second stage of the procedure was lower in patients who were operated on after 2016 (before 2016: median 6.4; after 2016: median 4.4; p = 0.010). Major morbidity decreased from 42.9% before 2016 to 31.3% after 2016, and the 90-day mortality rate decreased from 35.7% before 2016 to 12.5% after 2016. The three-year survival rate increased from 40.8% before 2016 to 73.4% after 2016. Our modified ALPPS procedure improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Minimizing the first step of the ALPPS procedure was key to these improvements.

Impact of circumferential resection margin on survival in ampullary cancer: retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ampullary carcinoma is a clinically variable entity. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors for the outcome of resected ampullary carcinoma patients with particular intent to analyse the influence of surgical radicality. METHODS: Patients undergoing resection between 2002 and 2017 were analysed. Clinicopathological parameters, perioperative outcome and survival were examined. Risk factor analysis for postresection survival was performed. Resection margin status was evaluated according to the revised classification for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were identified, 97.9 per cent (n = 229) underwent formal resection, while 2.1 per cent (n = 5) underwent ampullary resection. Histological subtypes were 46.6 per cent (n = 109) pancreatobiliary, 34.2 per cent (n = 80) intestinal, 11.5 per cent (n = 27) mixed, and 7.7 per cent (n = 18) undetermined. In the pancreatobiliary group, tumours were more advanced with more vascular resections, pT4 stage, G3 differentiation and pN+ status. Five-year overall survival was significantly different for pancreatobiliary compared to intestinal (51.7 per cent versus 72.8 per cent, P = 0.0087). In univariable analysis, age, pT4 stage, pN+, pancreatobiliary subtype and positive resection margin were significantly associated with worse overall survival. Long-term outcome was significantly better after true R0 resection (circumferential resection margin-, tumour clearance >1 mm) compared with circumferential resection margin+ (<1 mm) and R1 resections (5-year overall survival: 69.6 per cent, median overall survival 191 months versus 42.4 per cent and 53 months; P = 0.0017). CONCLUSION: Postresection survival of ampullary carcinoma patients is determined by histological subtype and surgical radicality. Intestinal differentiation is associated with less advanced tumour stages and better differentiation, which is reflected in a significantly better overall survival compared to pancreatobiliary differentiation. Despite this, true R0-resection is a prognostic key determinant in both entities, achieving 5-year survival in two-thirds of patients.

Risk factors and management of biliary leakage after Endocystectomy for hepatic cystic echinococcosis.

BACKGROUND: Endocystectomy is a conservative surgical approach to managing cystic echinococcosis. Bile leakage is the main complication of this technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with bile leakage and to assess the outcomes and cost efficiency of strategies used to treat bile leakage. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Patients who underwent endocystectomy between 2005 and 2020 were included. The preoperative characteristics, intra- and postoperative outcomes, hospital costs, and cost efficiency (the Diagnosis-Related Group reimbursement minus the overall cost) were evaluated prospectively. A total of eighty patients with 142 cysts were included. Postoperative complications occurred in 17 patients (21%), including 11 patients with bile leakage (type A: 1, type B: 6 and type C: 4 patients, total 13%). Bile leakage was more frequent in patients with preoperative MRI signs of cysto-biliary fistulas or intraoperative visible cysto-biliary fistulas (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively) and in patients with cysts larger than 8 cm (p = 0.03). Patients with bile leakage who underwent reoperation (type C) had significantly shorter hospital stays (9 vs. 16 days, p<0.01) and better cost efficiency than those who received radiologic or endocscopic interventions (€2,072 vs. -€2,097 p = 0.01). No mortality was observed, and recurrence was seen in two patients. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Endocystectomy is a safe and efficient technique. Preoperative and intraoperative cysto-biliary fistulas and a cyst diameter larger than 8 cm are correlated to postoperative bile leakage. Early operative management of bile leakage reduces hospital stay and improves cost efficiency compared with radiologic or endoscopic treatments.

DNA-methylation signature accurately differentiates pancreatic cancer from chronic pancreatitis in tissue and plasma.

OBJECTIVE: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy. Differentiation from chronic pancreatitis (CP) is currently inaccurate in about one-third of cases. Misdiagnoses in both directions, however, have severe consequences for patients. We set out to identify molecular markers for a clear distinction between PDAC and CP. DESIGN: Genome-wide variations of DNA-methylation, messenger RNA and microRNA level as well as combinations thereof were analysed in 345 tissue samples for marker identification. To improve diagnostic performance, we established a random-forest machine-learning approach. Results were validated on another 48 samples and further corroborated in 16 liquid biopsy samples. RESULTS: Machine-learning succeeded in defining markers to differentiate between patients with PDAC and CP, while low-dimensional embedding and cluster analysis failed to do so. DNA-methylation yielded the best diagnostic accuracy by far, dwarfing the importance of transcript levels. Identified changes were confirmed with data taken from public repositories and validated in independent sample sets. A signature of six DNA-methylation sites in a CpG-island of the protein kinase C beta type gene achieved a validated diagnostic accuracy of 100% in tissue and in circulating free DNA isolated from patient plasma. CONCLUSION: The success of machine-learning to identify an effective marker signature documents the power of this approach. The high diagnostic accuracy of discriminating PDAC from CP could have tremendous consequences for treatment success, once the result from still a limited number of liquid biopsy samples would be confirmed in a larger cohort of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer.

Protocol of a randomised controlled phase II clinical trial investigating PREoperative endoscopic injection of BOTulinum toxin into the sphincter of Oddi to reduce bile leakage after hepatic resection: the PREBOT-II trial.

INTRODUCTION: Bile leakage represents a major cause of morbidity following hepatic resection. Although most patients can be managed non-operatively, this complication requires diagnostics and therapeutic interventions. Preoperative endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) into the sphincter of Oddi represents an innovative approach to prevent bile leakage. The aim of the PREBOT-II trial is to generate the first randomised controlled trial data on the safety, feasibility and efficacy of preoperative endoscopic BTX injection into the sphincter of Oddi to prevent bile leakage following hepatic resection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PREBOT-II trial is an investigator-initiated, exploratory, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase II clinical trial with two parallel study groups. 70 patients scheduled for hepatic resection will be randomised to either the intervention or the control group. Patients of the intervention group will undergo preoperative endoscopic injection of BTX into the sphincter of Oddi 3-10 days before surgery, whereas in the control group only hepatic resection will be performed. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of a postoperative bile leakage within 30 days after hepatic resection according to the definition of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. The secondary endpoints comprise further postoperative morbidity parameters such as severity of postoperative bile leakage, post-hepatectomy haemorrhage or liver failure, mortality and quality of life up to 3 months after hepatic resection. Safety and feasibility of the procedure will also be recorded. ETHICS, FUNDING AND DISSEMINATION: The PREBOT-II trial has been approved by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (reference number 4044932) and the Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University (reference number AFmu-558/2021). This trial is supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00024061, EudraCT: 2020-006001-35.

Association of perioperative use of statins, metformin, and aspirin with recurrence after curative liver resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Statins, metformin, and aspirin have been reported to reduce the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effect of their perioperative use on survival outcomes of HCC patients following curative liver resection still remains unclear. METHOD: Three hundred and fifty three patients with a first diagnosis of HCC who underwent curative liver resection were included. Propensity score matching analysis with a users: nonusers ratio of 1:2 were performed for each of the medications (statins, metformin, and aspirin). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty two patients received statins, 48 patients used metformin, and 53 patients received aspirin for ≥90 days before surgery. None of the medications improved OS. RFS of statin users was significantly longer than that of nonusers (p = 0.021) in the matched cohort. Users of hydrophilic statins, but not lipophilic ones had a significantly longer RFS than nonusers. Multivariable analysis showed that statin use significantly improved RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.97, p = 0.044). No difference was seen in RFS between metformin users and nonusers. Among patients with diabetes, RFS was nonsignificantly longer in metformin users than in non-metformin users (84.1% vs. 60.85%, p = 0.069) in the matched cohort. No difference in postoperative RFS was seen between aspirin users and nonusers. CONCLUSION: Preoperative use of statins in patients with HCC can increase RFS after curative liver resection, but metformin and aspirin were not associated with improved survival. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings of the present study.

Assessing textbook outcomes following major liver surgery in association with obesity at a referral academic center.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes of major surgeries in tertiary educational hospitals have been complicated by the referral of high-risk patients and the participation of trainees in surgical procedures. We analyzed outcomes of major hepatectomies in a tertiary academic setting emphasizing the role of training and obesity on textbook outcomes (TO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 971 adult patients who underwent open major hepatectomy (Mesohepatectomy [n = 111], hemihepatectomy [n = 610], and extended hepatectomy [n = 250]) were evaluated. A TO was defined as: a negative resection margin, no grade B/C bile leak, no major complications, no in-hospital mortality, and no 30-day readmission. TOs were compared following operations performed by senior surgeons and those performed by junior surgeons under the supervision of senior surgeons and between patients with and without obesity. RESULTS: TO was achieved in 70.1% of patients overall (78.4% in mesohepatectomy, 73.1% in hemihepatectomy, and 59.2% in extended hepatectomy). The rate of TO was similar following operations performed by and supervised by a senior surgeon (69.3% vs 71.0%, p = 0.570). The rate of TO was significantly lower in patients with obesity (41.5% vs 74.6%, p < 0.001). Factors including increased age (odds ratio [OR] for 10-year increase = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.96, p = 0.009), obesity (OR = 0.25, 95%CI: 0.16-0.37, p < 0.001), biliodigestive anastomosis (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.19-0.40, p < 0.001), and portal vein resection (OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.28-0.87, p = 0.014) lower the rate of TO. CONCLUSION: Promising outcomes are possible after major hepatectomy in an academic setting. Obese patients and those undergoing more complex surgeries had a higher risk of poor postoperative outcomes.

Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy may be superior to laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy in terms of costs and profit: a retrospective pair-matched cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: A direct comparison of the cost-benefit analysis of retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (RPA) versus the minimally invasive transperitoneal access (LTA) approach is currently lacking. We hypothesized that RPA is more cost effective than LTA; promising significant savings for the healthcare system in an era of ever more limited resources. METHODS: We performed a monocentric retrospective observational cohort study based on data from our Endocrine Surgery Registry. Patients who were operated upon between 2019 and 2022 were included. After pair-matching, both cohorts (RPA vs. LTA) were compared for perioperative variables and treatment costs (process cost calculation), revenue and profit. RESULTS: Two homogenous cohorts of 43 patients each (RPA vs. LTA) were identified following matching. Patient characteristics between the cohorts were comparable. In terms of both treatment-associated costs and profit, the RPA procedure was superior to LTA (costs: US$5789.99 for RPA vs. US$6617.75 for LTA, P = 0.043; profit: US$1235.59 for RPA vs. US$653.33 for LTA, P = 0.027). The duration of inpatient treatment and comorbidities significantly influenced the cost of treatment and the overall profit. CONCLUSIONS: RPA appears not only to offer benefits over LTA in terms of perioperative morbidity and length of hospital stay, but also has a superior financial cost/benefit profile.